The Modi Government’s Silence on Police Brutality: A Pattern of Accountability Avoidance?

The recent protests in Delhi over the NEET paper leak have highlighted the contentious relationship between the government and its critics. Rahul Gandhi, leader of opposition in Lok Sabha, has taken direct aim at Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah over their handling of the situation.

Gandhi’s column is a scathing critique of the government’s response to the protests. He questions how the Modi government responds to young people demanding answers about their future, pointing out that pellet guns, nail-studded lathis, and tear gas were used against peaceful protesters. This resulted in several injuries, including minors with broken bones.

Gandhi argues that the Centre’s handling of the situation reflects a larger pattern of accountability avoidance by the Modi government. He cites examples of how power is highly centralised, with the Delhi Police and Rapid Action Force reporting directly to Amit Shah-led Union Home Ministry. Gandhi presents two possibilities: either Shah authorised the police action or he had “no idea that it was taking place”.

Gandhi’s critique raises questions about the role of the home minister in this incident. His failure to address Parliament over the issue and his refusal to order an inquiry have led many to question his responsibility as Home Minister. Gandhi is adamant that there are only two possibilities: either Shah authorised the attack on students, making him culpable, or he was entirely incompetent for not knowing about it.

The government’s response has been predictable. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has maintained that the Opposition cannot dictate which minister should come to Parliament and make a statement. However, Gandhi’s demand for a Supreme Court-monitored inquiry is gaining momentum.

This incident is part of a larger narrative of police brutality in India. The use of force against protesters has been documented time and again, with little accountability from those responsible. The Modi government’s silence on this issue is deafening, raising questions about its commitment to upholding democratic values.

The opposition continues to demand answers from Amit Shah, but it remains to be seen how far the government will go in trying to avoid accountability. Will they allow a Supreme Court-monitored inquiry or continue to stonewall? The answer has significant implications for India’s democracy and its commitment to human rights.

The Modi government’s handling of this incident reflects a larger trend in Indian politics: the centralisation of power and curtailment of civil liberties have made protests more frequent. The government’s response has been characterised by authoritarianism and disregard for democratic norms.

As India watches this drama unfold, one thing is certain: its democracy will be the biggest loser if the Modi government continues to avoid accountability for its actions. It is time for the government to take responsibility for its handling of the situation and demonstrate its commitment to upholding human rights and democratic values.